🔗 Share this article

Turns out he was able to withstand losing against Grimsby. He weathered a decisive European final versus one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood losing at home against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, squandering the team's best academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership defender in Blackburn’s title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. The most casual observer can see the irony here: a manager who often railed at his players for failing in individual battles crumbling when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode seems to paint the director in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, given his nine months of experience at Southampton, to regard him as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his friendship with his former boss Omar Berrada rather than any demonstrable skill. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the hapless Dan Ashworth before him, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated as one of football's strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that United’s mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

The Strategic Conflict Over Formation & Ideology

For example, it was the director who having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these pleas were resisted. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when issued by a man with the unimpeachable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of three England caps and a contributor to a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to explain his thought processes publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is walking away with full compensation, without any compensation reduction clause in place. The director seldom speaks publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – men like him – function on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not equivalent to being ready to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Power Behind Command

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to adopt analytics and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he announced that United’s style of play “shall be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in this technical football matters, leveraging his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Most importantly he is immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply better. Whom else could one trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Football Hierarchy: Directors Above Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier football. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and energy to join a club and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many businesses have these guys established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to place the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. Better by far to decide the strategy in the boardroom and appoint someone who will adapt their methods to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not creating the food, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, their job has become less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they can do little to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined while the people who appointed him live to blunder another day.

The Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And possibly on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance at work: the rise of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the system coach and then dismiss him for playing too much 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and later bin them for taking too long. And above all be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.