🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – appears to require it requires a PhD in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It's Expensive

According to a recent study, typical households pays $27,000 each year on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently the government is shut down due to partisan disputes over tax credits which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer because this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How medical professionals get paid would change. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from workers and companies. In similar programs, an employee earning average wages must contribute approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Unless you compare that with what the typical American pays. I can name multiple businesses that are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits along with supporting healthcare facilities. When including these expenses compared with what we pay on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would raise existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and company payments. And, like much of federal military, technology, social programs and transportation services, the system should be outsourced by private contractors rather than a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would render administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complicated (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension about benefits among workers – as opposed to the current system where they have to interpret the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for employers since we wouldn't have access to workers' health histories for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that government play important functions in our lives, including national security to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses that employ the majority of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Are there numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, despite increased taxation required, would remain a better and less expensive approach for not only managing medical expenses but providing access to everyone.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, must tone down our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places significantly behind many other countries with the best healthcare globally, based on major studies. Perhaps a bright spot amid present circumstances could be that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and agree that big changes need to happen.